Skip to main content

Blog Post 1 - Peter

One key sticking point from this week's reading are the parallels between the Great Depression and the Covid-19 pandemic's effect on the art industry, but despite the parallels the difference in federal support for the industry between the two periods is striking. The Great Depression decimated the art industry as people struggled to cover the necessities and had little to no discretionary money left for entertainment. The Federal Theatre Project was a program in FDR's New Deal that employed 15,000 men and women within a year to run performances at little to no cost to the audience. This was one of the first programs that went directly to preserving the skills of a worker to prevent these artists from having to shift the industry they worked in. It was a huge success with nearly 30 million people attending a performance in the 4 years of its existence. Covid-19 devastated the arts industry with 99% of arts organizations experiencing financial loss of a combined $17.3 billion dollars, with theaters being the hardest (Osborne 12). As many as 63% of artists experienced unemployment with BIPOC organizations being hit the hardest. 


While there was unprecedented relief funds for Covid-19, these artistic organizations were often left out of the equation: "the majority of available funds go to the wealthiest, whitest, least experimental institutions, thus reinforcing a hierarchy in which some individuals receive high-paying, high-profile jobs while the minority struggle" (Osborne 12). This picture is from a protest of hundreds of art workers in NYC looking for relief. Many of them brought their art with them to the demonstration to help bring the protest to life. My key takeaway from these readings is that industries like the art industry may be viewed as discretionary or non-essential from outsiders, leading them to be ignored in public relief, but the preservation of art and artistic skills help preserve our culture and expression and thus our identity, which is extremely undervalued.  

Comments

  1. Great point, Peter--I appreciate your attention to the ways that public funding can influence what kinds of artistic production are preserved in times of crisis and what kinds are left to wither. Why do you think we didn't see the kind of concerted investment in the arts as part of, say, the PPP loan program (these funds WERE available to some artists--but only if they employed other people) that we did during the New Deal? Does it reflect something about the position of the arts in today's society? The type of arts we value? The immediate goals of COVID-19 relief? Or is it something more like historical hindsight (e.g., the FTP received relatively paltry funding compared to other WPA programs; maybe it is only our ability to see the effects of that funding play out over a century that makes it seem substantial by comparison)?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Politics and Theatrics

 This post will focus on the correlations between politics and theater. Augusto Boal makes it a point to highlight how theater is political which makes me question: is politics is theater? Boal believes that by nature humans are political and since theater is a result of human activities it too is political. Politics and theater tend to portray different messages to society. For example, theater is not generally taken as seriously by people in society while politics is taken very seriously and impacts all people. Elections, voting, and media portrayals are all outlets in which politics is performed. If politics is a form of theater, then politicians would be the ones performing the theatrics.  During the 2020 presidential debates between Donald Trump and President Biden, many people tuned in to hear out the political perspectives hashed out in real time. Eventually, as the debate continued the audience quickly realized that it was turning into a political spectacle based on ho...

Las Hijas de Violencia and Pussy Riot - Bella Blog Post #3

  One thing that stuck with me from this week's reading was Las Hijas de Violencia. It reminded me of the forum theatre we did on Wednesday. More specifically, the power of confrontation against the oppressor. I think a lot of the time, they(oppressors) don't expect such a reaction which gives the oppressed a sort of power. I also think the use of the confetti gun instead of a violent weapon. In this way, the oppressed doesn’t become the oppressor through gaining their freedom. Then the addition of the song adds another element of surprise. The use of punk amplifies the harasser looking ridiculous as mentioned. They're bringing active energy to the problem of street harassment. I think their movement works because it makes noise and not just audibly.  The article mentions taking inspiration from Pussy Riot. They are a Russian feminist protest and performance group that performs guerilla gigs of punk rock music in public places. They wear neon balaclavas and acid-bright tigh...

El Teatro Campesino - Will Blog 2

Yolanda Broyles-González's article "El Teatro Campesino and the Mexican Popular Performance Tradition" looks at the development and significance of the El Teatro Campesino theater company founded in the 1960s to support the United Farm Workers movement. Broyles-González argues that El Teatro Campesino draws on a long history of Mexican popular performance traditions like carnival and religious pageantry, as well as European avant-garde theater techniques. She examines how El Teatro Campesino's performances incorporated elements of these traditions, such as satire, physical comedy, and music, to engage audiences and create a sense of community. Broyles-González also explores how the theater company's performances challenged dominant cultural narratives and offered a vision of social change that centered the experiences and struggles of Chicano farm workers. A quote that resonated with me was that "the real language of African theatre is to be found in the stru...