One key sticking point from this week's reading are the parallels between the Great Depression and the Covid-19 pandemic's effect on the art industry, but despite the parallels the difference in federal support for the industry between the two periods is striking. The Great Depression decimated the art industry as people struggled to cover the necessities and had little to no discretionary money left for entertainment. The Federal Theatre Project was a program in FDR's New Deal that employed 15,000 men and women within a year to run performances at little to no cost to the audience. This was one of the first programs that went directly to preserving the skills of a worker to prevent these artists from having to shift the industry they worked in. It was a huge success with nearly 30 million people attending a performance in the 4 years of its existence. Covid-19 devastated the arts industry with 99% of arts organizations experiencing financial loss of a combined $17.3 billion dollars, with theaters being the hardest (Osborne 12). As many as 63% of artists experienced unemployment with BIPOC organizations being hit the hardest.
This post will focus on the correlations between politics and theater. Augusto Boal makes it a point to highlight how theater is political which makes me question: is politics is theater? Boal believes that by nature humans are political and since theater is a result of human activities it too is political. Politics and theater tend to portray different messages to society. For example, theater is not generally taken as seriously by people in society while politics is taken very seriously and impacts all people. Elections, voting, and media portrayals are all outlets in which politics is performed. If politics is a form of theater, then politicians would be the ones performing the theatrics. During the 2020 presidential debates between Donald Trump and President Biden, many people tuned in to hear out the political perspectives hashed out in real time. Eventually, as the debate continued the audience quickly realized that it was turning into a political spectacle based on ho...
Great point, Peter--I appreciate your attention to the ways that public funding can influence what kinds of artistic production are preserved in times of crisis and what kinds are left to wither. Why do you think we didn't see the kind of concerted investment in the arts as part of, say, the PPP loan program (these funds WERE available to some artists--but only if they employed other people) that we did during the New Deal? Does it reflect something about the position of the arts in today's society? The type of arts we value? The immediate goals of COVID-19 relief? Or is it something more like historical hindsight (e.g., the FTP received relatively paltry funding compared to other WPA programs; maybe it is only our ability to see the effects of that funding play out over a century that makes it seem substantial by comparison)?
ReplyDelete